From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H6k4W-0000jI-Q5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:53:36 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H6k4U-0000hq-80
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:53:35 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6k4T-0000hY-EY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:53:33 -0500
Received: from [64.233.166.181] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H6k4S-00042F-U8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:53:33 -0500
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id h31so1300348pyc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46d6db660701160053ra0eb495gf01f36e8baefdf33@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:53:32 +0100
From: "Christian MICHON" <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtualBox PC virtualization released as Open Source
In-Reply-To: <200701160838.00541.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45ABCFE0.7060609@gmx.de>
	<20070115225723.GE15118@erizo.shearer.org>
	<46d6db660701160025q5e34810cy508f0469a3c1a3ee@mail.gmail.com>
	<200701160838.00541.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

sorry I meant " :) "

it's a stupid typo mistake...

basically: video is faster, hdd access is faster.
I'll see if I can gather more figures.

I hope too we can put these improvements back inside qemu
of course! :)

On 1/16/07, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25, Christian MICHON wrote:
> > based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail
> > (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on
> > windows hosts :(
>
> Why is that a bad thing? VirtualBox is GPL, kqemu is not, so I'd say
> VirtualBox being faster is a good thing. It means there's no need for
> proprietary kernel modules.
>
> Paul
>


--
Christian