From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HC2Af-00045N-HO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:13:49 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HC2Ae-00044R-LD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:13:49 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC2Ae-00044K-HO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:13:48 -0500
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HC2Ae-0008VS-EI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:13:48 -0500
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so47557and
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46d6db660701301513t2debe9dfpe4517fe0c72cb11e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:13:47 +0100
From: "Christian MICHON" <christian.michon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] current qemu cvs broken for mingw hosts
In-Reply-To: <200701302255.26377.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46d6db660701301112t7902f5aak452a1cf1c0bc2ea4@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0701302023190.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<46d6db660701301209t62180911vdd8e72aee37b4acc@mail.gmail.com>
	<200701302255.26377.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 1/30/07, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Did you test it? I'm fairly certain it still won't work. AFAICS You're not
> setting the field anywhere.
>

it solved the compilation, which was broken, which was my primary
concern. Your patches normally don't break the build :)
so in a sense, with regards to the current cvs state, it helps fixing
the compilation, without segfault for example.

the binary works. The struct statement was missing the "chr".
Now, in term of functionality, I do not know how you test it,
if this was your question.

-- 
Christian