Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] qemu-iotests: Add test for bz #1745922

[Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 16:27 +0000, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.09.2019 18:28, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/qemu-iotests/263     | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   tests/qemu-iotests/263.out | 40 +++++++++++++++++
> >   tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  2 +
> >   3 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/263
> >   create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/263.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/263 b/tests/qemu-iotests/263
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 0000000000..d2c030fae9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/263
> 
> [..]
> 
> > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/group
> > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group
> > @@ -274,5 +274,7 @@
> >   257 rw
> >   258 rw quick
> >   262 rw quick migration
> > +263 rw quick
> >   265 rw auto quick
> >   266 rw quick
> > +>>>>>>> patched
> > 
> 
> last line is a mistake.
Last minute merge mistake :-(

> 
> also, test failed for me:
> 
> 263      fail       [19:21:35] [19:21:35]                    output mismatch (see 263.out.bad)
> --- /work/src/qemu/maxim-luks/tests/qemu-iotests/263.out        2019-09-13 19:11:45.464727427 +0300
> +++ /work/src/qemu/maxim-luks/tests/qemu-iotests/263.out.bad    2019-09-13 19:21:35.535381253 +0300
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> 
>   testing LUKS qcow2 encryption
> 
> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT: No crypto library supporting PBKDF in this build: Function not implemented
>   Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=1048576 encrypt.format=luks encrypt.key-secret=sec0 encrypt.iter-time=10
>   == reading the whole image ==
>   read 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
> Failures: 263
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
> 
> 
> and if reconfigure with
>   --enable-gnutls --enable-gcrypt --enable-vhost-crypto --enable-crypto-afalg
> (don't know which one is actually needed)
> it works..
> 
> so, we at least should skip the test if it's unsupported
Don't know. I based this test on 188 and it also doesn't have anything special about this.
Its not in auto group though.
I guess we need to ask Daniel about this.



Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky