From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcS0E-0005RS-48 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:36:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcS0D-0005Qr-4h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:36:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcS0C-0005Qo-Uw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:36:28 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.38.19]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IcS0C-0003N3-Ls for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:36:28 -0400 Received: from volta.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:216:d3ff:fe17:fd00]) by hall.aurel32.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IcS0A-0005eH-V3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:36:27 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] ident=aurel32) by volta.aurel32.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IcS0G-0000XZ-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:36:32 +0200 Message-ID: <47015A50.6030808@aurel32.net> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:36:32 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/pc-bios ppc_rom.bin References: <47009C20.7000809@qumranet.com> <1191222768.16080.0.camel@bxl-cdrw.bxl.cronos-technologies.com> <36FA7E24-859B-4033-BB37-2C8453D81677@web.de> <1191253624.3514.56.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com> <20071001185627.GI13317@networkno.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl a écrit : > On 10/1/07, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> Blue Swirl wrote: >> The one doesn't exclude the other. That said, I regard the ability to >> boot unaltered real-world firmare as an important test of the quality >> of a system emulation. > > Maybe. The CPU probes for cacheline size, checks for errata #42 vs > #45, reads debug registers, attempts to identify the bus speed by > comparing I/O access times, tries to verify the system using a TPM and > fails all cases. What can you do? Emulate a simpler architecture like mips or arm? ;-) -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net