From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcSh4-00054E-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:20:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcSh1-00052Y-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:20:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcSh1-00052P-70 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:20:43 -0400 Received: from smtp23.orange.fr ([80.12.242.50]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IcSh0-0004tm-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:20:43 -0400 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2351.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C0ECF1C0008A for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ANice-251-1-11-169.w86-200.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.200.14.169]) by mwinf2351.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 89FA31C00087 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <470164AB.8020803@wanadoo.fr> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:20:43 +0200 From: Laurent Desnogues MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/pc-bios ppc_rom.bin References: <47009C20.7000809@qumranet.com> <1191222768.16080.0.camel@bxl-cdrw.bxl.cronos-technologies.com> <36FA7E24-859B-4033-BB37-2C8453D81677@web.de> <1191253624.3514.56.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com> <20071001185627.GI13317@networkno.de> <47015A50.6030808@aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <47015A50.6030808@aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Aurelien Jarno a =C3=A9crit : >> Maybe. The CPU probes for cacheline size, checks for errata #42 vs >> #45, reads debug registers, attempts to identify the bus speed by >> comparing I/O access times, tries to verify the system using a TPM and >> fails all cases. What can you do? >=20 > Emulate a simpler architecture like mips or arm? ;-) I don't think ARM qualifies as a simple architecture, it certainly isn't in the same league as MIPS, at least not ARMv6 and ARMv7 :) Laurent