From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Icmkf-00027v-5n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:45:49 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Icmkc-00026h-Mq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:45:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Icmkc-00026a-FW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:45:46 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Icmkb-0005T4-UK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:45:46 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so3087225nfu
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <470291D3.8020805@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:45:39 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: merge GGI support? [was: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CRIS target port]
References: <20071002105745.GB4845@edgar.underground.se.axis.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021258510.28395@racer.site>
	<20071002164226.GB13534@aon.at>
In-Reply-To: <20071002164226.GB13534@aon.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

What does one gain with GGI support?  I've never seen a good answer to this.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> If someone prefers patches in another form or access to my git 
>>> repository, let me know and I'll be happy to provide that.
>>>       
>> Why not add a fork on http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/?  It's easy: just 
>>     
>
> Ah, very nice.
> Would anybody be willing to apply the ggi-display into this on behalf of me?
>
> http://uclibc.org/~aldot/qemu/
>
> has my working copy against cvs from a few days ago.. The code is
> the same as from 2004/2005, just rediffed the hunks against the configure
> script a year ago.
>
>   
>> click on the "fork" link, fill out a small form, and add yourself as user.
>>     
>
> Well, ideally i'd like to see the GGI support living directly in
> the upstream repo.
> If i need to make changes to get it accepted, please let me know.
>
> thanks and cheers,
> Bernhard
>
>
>
>