From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IklvT-00077B-PM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:29:59 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IklvT-00076I-6j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:29:59 -0400
Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org ([129.104.30.34])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <fabrice@bellard.org>) id 1IklvS-00048O-El
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:29:58 -0400
Message-ID: <471F9C7D.7020007@bellard.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:26:53 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu host-utils.c
References: <E1IkT5K-0007xn-ES@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>	<471F1C7F.8060003@bellard.org>
	<1193222136.16781.229.camel@rapid>	<20071024173726.GC6666@networkno.de>
	<1193251587.15825.23.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com>
In-Reply-To: <1193251587.15825.23.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: l_indien@magic.fr

Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> J. Mayer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>>>> I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c 
>>>> revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer 
>>>> divisions from target-i386/helper.c should be put in the same file.
>>> I fully agree with this. I still use the same code in the PowerPC
>>> op_helper.c file because I never conviced myself that the host_utils
>>> version was bug-free. I would likely switch to the common version if I
>>> could be sure it cannot lead to any regression.
>> Like this? Questions/Comments I have:
>> - Is the BSD-style copyright still ok for this version?
> 
> This I cannot tell. Fabrice should say how he feels about it.
> 1 detail: I just copied Fabrice code from i386 target, then I don't own
> any copyright on it...

BSD-style license is OK.

> [...]

Fabrice.