From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Irih3-0002rd-Km
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:27:49 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Irih2-0002rR-6n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:27:48 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irih2-0002rO-2A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:27:48 -0500
Received: from sp604005mt.neufgp.fr ([84.96.92.11] helo=smtp.Neuf.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <fabrice@bellard.org>) id 1Irih1-0007y2-Rf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:27:48 -0500
Received: from [84.102.211.46] by sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006))
	with ESMTP id <0JRF00HOX1X7XEM1@sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:15:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:14:35 +0100
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
Message-id: <4738DE5B.2030107@bellard.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Linux user mode tests updated
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I put new architectures in the Linux user mode regression tests
available at http://bellard.org/qemu/download.html .

The interested developpers can try to fix the following targets:

x86_64 sh4 alpha ppc64 hppa.

The challenge is to make a dynamically linked "ls -l" work !

I might spend some time on x86_64.

Fabrice.