From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Is44J-0004nV-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:17:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Is44H-0004nI-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:17:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Is44H-0004nF-AJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:17:13 -0500 Received: from sp604002mt.neufgp.fr ([84.96.92.61] helo=sMtp.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Is44H-0007Wx-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:17:13 -0500 Received: from [84.102.211.199] by sp604002mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JRG00KDDTRDUI20@sp604002mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:14:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:13:30 +0100 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix TLS support on x86 In-reply-to: <1194979605.918.19.camel@phantasm.home.enterpriseandprosperity.com> Message-id: <473A218A.6090202@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <46696500.5020406@suse.de> <20070618192139.GK19155@networkno.de> <467958F6.2070804@suse.de> <20070621225550.GB25967@networkno.de> <1801E7EE-FF0A-4A43-88ED-4503DEBBC831@suse.de> <20070621231612.GC25967@networkno.de> <4688CCFC.3000100@suse.de> <4739F095.7030109@mail.berlios.de> <1194979605.918.19.camel@phantasm.home.enterpriseandprosperity.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 19:44 +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to test user mode emulation on MIPS host. >> >> Do you have newer versions of your patches which match >> current CVS HEAD? TLS support is still missing there, >> so QEMU user mode emulation is not really usable without >> working patches. > > I don't know about anyone else, but I have some patches for TLS for arm > and i386. The patches are significantly out of date with the recent > linux-user changes. I won't be updating them until I finish with the > current set of changes to linux-user. I'll try to merge and improve the i386 TLS patch ASAP. Moreover, after having looked again at the linux-user code and at the regression tests, my conclusion is that the linux-user QEMU targets must be statically linked and that it should not depend on host libraries such as the C library. Fabrice.