From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IwNl3-0002mN-4x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:07:13 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IwNl1-0002k4-GF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:07:11 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwNl1-0002jq-AN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:07:11 -0500
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <akuster@kama-aina.net>) id 1IwNl0-0004XS-Ov
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:07:10 -0500
Received: from pahoa.hi.kama-aina.net (unknown [10.235.20.2])
	by hermes.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3F41F397
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:07:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4749D5EB.8060308@kama-aina.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:07:07 -1000
From: Armin <akuster@kama-aina.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] pflash_register question
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


Hello,

I see there are two instances of pflash_register() , one for 
pflash_cfi01.c and the other in pflash_cfi02.c. In order to get the 
proper one, I assume we use link order?

- Armin