From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J22Er-0007JX-ML for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:21:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J22Eq-0007IN-WA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:21:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J22Eq-0007IA-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:21:20 -0500 Received: from emh05.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.111]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J22Eq-0004fW-KS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:21:20 -0500 Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-12.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.96]) by emh05-2.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id EDC228C50A for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:21:16 +0200 (EET) Received: from marumake.local (a88-112-236-112.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.236.112]) by emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F794C045 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:21:15 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <475E64A1.6070409@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:21:21 +0200 From: Heikki Lindholm MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Dbus support - a proposal management API References: <475E5403.2000705@bellard.org> <1197364997.4242.10.camel@frecb07144> In-Reply-To: <1197364997.4242.10.camel@frecb07144> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Laurent Vivier kirjoitti: > Le mardi 11 d=C3=A9cembre 2007 =C3=A0 10:10 +0100, Fabrice Bellard a =C3= =A9crit : >> Hi, >=20 > Hi, >=20 >> At this point I am not interested in integrating it into QEMU as it is= =20 >> one more API level to maintain in addition to the command line monitor= .=20 >> However, I can change my mind if several projects insists to have a=20 >> similar interface. >=20 > perhaps the DBUS interface can replace the command line monitor ? > We have just to move the command line interface to a client speaking to > qemu through the DBUS interface. That would pretty much ruin the Mac OS X port and maybe others that=20 haven't got dbus in a "default" installation. -- Heikki Lindholm