From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZdw-0007Sq-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:39:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZdt-0007RC-Pi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:39:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFZdt-0007R0-7y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:39:09 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFZds-0000kM-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:39:08 -0500 Message-ID: <478FA0C9.8070907@mail.berlios.de> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:39:05 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license References: <200801171355.28625.uli@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200801171355.28625.uli@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Is GPLv3 unwanted for QEMU source code? If yes: why? Would it prevent inclusion of QEMU in common Linux distributions? Stefan Ulrich Hecht schrieb: > Hi! > > Our Teenage Mutant Legal Turtles have discovered that s390-dis.c contains > GPLv3 code. Fortunately, the actual code has not changed since the last > GPLv2 binutils release, save for the license headers, so it suffices to > change those back to fix the problem. > > CU > Uli