From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KS5xv-0003MK-G1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:07:51 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KS5xu-0003M7-04
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:07:51 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34071 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KS5xt-0003M4-QC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:07:49 -0400
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:23487)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sasha.sirotkin@gmail.com>) id 1KS5xt-00083h-FW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:07:49 -0400
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2969240wfd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <478c82f00808100107v3545b8fay3cad589669d241fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:07:48 +0300
From: "Alexander (Sasha) Sirotkin" <sasha.sirotkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu "acceleration" slows qemu down
In-Reply-To: <f284c33d0808092218w52006a12j27dd6442fe15ce8f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <478c82f00808091605y4d401ad6h7d8f537afa8f8924@mail.gmail.com>
	<f284c33d0808092218w52006a12j27dd6442fe15ce8f@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Mulyadi Santosa
<mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Alexander (Sasha) Sirotkin
> <sasha.sirotkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Linux host, WinXP guest. With kqemu acceleration enabled it runs
>> significantly slower, not faster as one would expect.  /dev/shm is
>> mounted. max-user-freq set to 1024.
>>
>> Any ideas ?
>
> Many possibilities here..... what kind of applications do you run
> inside the Windows guest?
>
> essentially, kqemu helps if there aren't many traps which results into
> code translation or guest+host are using same data bus width (not sure
> if it's the correct term, i.e 32 bit guest on 32 bit host...).
>
> see kqemu documents about technical limitation and assumption on codes
> that can be executed directly by kqemu.
No applications, just windows boot.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Mulyadi.
>
>
>