From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JH0QP-0006zC-6M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:27:09 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JH0QN-0006yW-TY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:27:07 -0500
Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org ([129.104.30.34])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <fabrice@bellard.org>) id 1JH0QO-0000st-1L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:27:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4794D5E5.8040603@bellard.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:27:01 +0100
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu softmmu_header.h
References: <E1JGyF4-0007Ue-K9@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<alpine.LSU.1.00.0801211523120.5731@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0801211523120.5731@racer.site>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> 
>> CVSROOT:	/sources/qemu
>> Module name:	qemu
>> Changes by:	Fabrice Bellard <bellard>	08/01/21 15:07:18
>>
>> Modified files:
>> 	.              : softmmu_header.h 
>>
>> Log message:
>> 	fixed register constraint
>>
>> CVSWeb URLs:
>> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/softmmu_header.h?cvsroot=qemu&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
> 
> As has been pointed out already, this breaks compilation _at least_ with 
> gcc 3.4.2 on MinGW.

If it does, it is a very weird gcc bug. The previous code was clearly 
incorrect.

Fabrice.