From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMW2C-0000nd-1w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:12:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMW2B-0000mw-6D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:12:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMW2B-0000ml-1j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:12:55 -0500 Received: from adsl137-89.aknet.it ([213.21.137.89] helo=zipman.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMW2A-0000WH-KN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:12:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zipman.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978C0283FC for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:46:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from zipman.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.zipman.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uZC9cD3zch6 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:46:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.192.3] (unknown [192.168.192.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zipman.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2547281EE for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:46:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47A8D918.6070405@zipman.it> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:46:00 +0100 From: Flavio Visentin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x References: <20080205005142.GD4368@implementation> <18344.18661.39309.29838@mariner.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <18344.18661.39309.29838@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ian Jackson wrote: > So while this setup is being made configurable, I think it would > probably be best for qemu's range to be changed to a random range. The customizable subnet is obviously the preferred choice, but if I had to choose a subnet I'd choose 192.168.255.0/24. Someone thinks it's a broadcast subnet ;-) - -- Flavio Visentin GPG Key: http://www.zipman.it/gpgkey.asc There are only 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who don't. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHqNkYusUmHkh1cnoRAsXTAJ44TEWsXvg0o2KPPwLAlAXI+GjiBwCfTlug +SmdxGnjlDgOhg8BWKuyrVA= =WBCX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----