From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: andreas.faerber@web.de, Asheesh Laroia <asheesh@creativecommons.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:39:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A9AA7C.9030103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18345.36535.82205.721504@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Hi,
> Using a (once) randomly-chosen default greatly reduces the odds of
> that happening. Many many people foolishly choose 10.0.{0,1,2,3}.x.
> Many fewer choose (say) 172.30.206.x. So the fixed qemu default
> should be 172.30.206.x, or some other range also chosen at random.
A few years back I've worked for a web company, wrote the border router
firewall rules, had some rules in there to catch packages with
rfc1918-private addresses in public network. Watching the statistics
showed that the 172.16/12 range was _much_ less used than 10/8 and
192.168/16.
I think 10/8 to be used by companies alot. 192.168.$smallnumber.0/24
seems to be a quite common default for DSL routers and the like.
Thus picking a random /24 network from 172.16/12 as new default value
has a pretty good chance to vastly reduce the number of clashes with
existing setups.
HTH,
Gerd
--
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 0:24 [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x Asheesh Laroia
2008-02-05 0:44 ` Jonathan Kalbfeld
2008-02-05 0:51 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-02-05 10:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-02-05 10:44 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-02-05 11:30 ` Ian Jackson
2008-02-05 12:58 ` Andreas Färber
2008-02-05 15:48 ` Warner Losh
2008-02-05 16:16 ` Eddie Kohler
2008-02-05 17:42 ` Ben Taylor
2008-02-05 19:06 ` Asheesh Laroia
2008-02-05 21:22 ` Ben Taylor
2008-02-05 21:29 ` Paul Brook
2008-02-05 21:34 ` Asheesh Laroia
2008-02-05 22:12 ` Jernej Simončič
2008-02-05 22:24 ` Asheesh Laroia
2008-02-06 1:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-02-06 3:34 ` Paul Brook
2008-02-06 10:40 ` Ian Jackson
2008-02-06 11:01 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-02-06 16:36 ` Ian Jackson
2008-02-06 12:39 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2008-02-05 20:09 ` andrzej zaborowski
2008-02-05 20:31 ` Blue Swirl
2008-02-05 21:46 ` Flavio Visentin
2008-02-05 0:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A9AA7C.9030103@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=asheesh@creativecommons.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).