* [Qemu-devel] FPU Accuracy on i386
@ 2008-04-04 16:51 Joel Sherrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Joel Sherrill @ 2008-04-04 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailing list.
I am using the precompiled 0.91 image to do
automated testing of i386-rtems. In the Ada
validation suite, 17 of the 21 failures appear
to be due to FP calculation accuracy. Here
is a typical test output for these:
,.,. CXG2002 ACATS 2.5 88-01-01 00:00:00
---- CXG2002 Check the accuracy of the complex modulus function.
* CXG2002 test 1 -- abs(bigreal + 0i) actual:
+Inf******************* expected:
1.18973149535723177E+4932 difference:
-Inf******************* max_err:
3.86972841582221554E+4913.
* CXG2002 test 2 -- abs(0 + bigreal*i) actual:
+Inf******************* expected:
1.18973149535723177E+4932 difference:
-Inf******************* max_err:
3.86972841582221554E+4913.
* CXG2002 test 8 -- abs(1 + 1*i) actual: 1.41421356237309515E+00
expected: 1.41421356237309505E+00 difference:
-9.67108337857069955E-17 max_err:
4.59988025005012224E-19.
**** CXG2002 FAILED ****************************.
I am running with the "-cpu 486" option on a 32-bit
x86 host.
Are there known issues with FPU code in qemu that
I should be aware of?
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-04-04 17:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-04 16:51 [Qemu-devel] FPU Accuracy on i386 Joel Sherrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).