Re: [PATCH-for-10.0 3/3] hw/boards: Rename no_sdcard -> create_default_sdcard_drive

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 25/11/2024 19.14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Invert the 'no_sdcard' logic, renaming it as the more
> explicit "create_default_sdcard_drive". Machines are
> supposed to create a SD Card drive when this flag is
> set. In many cases it doesn't make much sense (as
> boards don't expose SD Card host controller),

This indeed shows the insanity of the previous state, thanks for tackling it!

> but this
> is patch only aims to expose that nonsense; so no
> logical change intended (mechanical patch using gsed).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index 86fcf9c81f..5cec73ae68 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
>           no_cdrom:1,
>           pci_allow_0_address:1,
>           legacy_fw_cfg_order:1;
> -    OnOffAuto no_sdcard;
> +    bool create_default_sdcard_drive;

Can we maybe still bikeshed about the naming here? The current name is a 
little bit long, and maybe we could "standardize" the prefix of the flags 
here a little bit. We already have one switch starting with "has_..." and 
some others starting with "auto_enable_...", so I'd maybe suggest one of 
those instead:

   has_default_sdcard
   auto_enable_sdcard

WDYT?

  Thomas


>       bool is_default;
>       const char *default_machine_opts;
>       const char *default_boot_order;