From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jm6xY-0002PN-Jt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:41:56 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jm6xW-0002NC-LY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:41:55 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jm6xW-0002N7-G6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:41:54 -0400
Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@suse.de>) id 1Jm6xW-0001qp-8F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:41:54 -0400
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B7940887
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:41:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4805F2D2.4000602@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:36:34 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Reboot CPU on triple fault
References: <47EE86E0.4070703@reactos.org>	<9C7667CB-2CF0-4AC0-843B-6EF442196CAC@csgraf.de>	<47F0B445.4030806@suse.de>	<4804D254.5040301@siemens.com>	<4805B673.3010200@suse.de>
	<4805EAE6.1070601@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <4805EAE6.1070601@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jan Kiszka schrieb:
> And we need a consensus regarding fault reporting... What about
> confining the dump to the logfile, leaving the console alone?

Seems that the message is a big problem now, even if intentional
triple-faulting didn't work in the past and caused qemu to abort. So
yes, maybe the logfile must be enough.

But we definitely need a new -d option then so that a developer can
always run qemu with this option. The existing ones (most notably -d int
where this one would belong logically) are producing way too much output
to have them always enabled.

Kevin