From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzLxs-0004I2-3Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:43:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzLxq-0005d6-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:43:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4817f5c3b20aedba869608c06e76d11a722f4864.camel@gmail.com> From: Aarushi Mehta Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:12:45 +0530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trivial malloc to g_malloc in thunk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Julia Suvorova Hi This is a trivial contribution part of the BiteSizedTasks on the wiki. I found this discussion http://git.corpit.ru/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=b45c03f585ea9bb1af76c73e82195418c294919d on migrating even g_malloc to g_new, is this not appropriate for the same? The wiki can presumably use an update regarding this. Signed-off-by: Aarushi --- thunk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/thunk.c b/thunk.c index d5d8645cd4..03fb2abab7 100644 --- a/thunk.c +++ b/thunk.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void thunk_register_struct(int id, const char *name, const argtype *types) for(i = 0;i < 2; i++) { offset = 0; max_align = 1; - se->field_offsets[i] = malloc(nb_fields * sizeof(int)); + se->field_offsets[i] = g_malloc(nb_fields * sizeof(int)); type_ptr = se->field_types; for(j = 0;j < nb_fields; j++) { size = thunk_type_size(type_ptr, i); -- 2.17.1