qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, philmd@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
	mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7] pflash: Require backend size to match device, improve errors
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:47:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <481d398a-e26c-6c0a-20b7-7466ae1ebf1f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190308062455.29755-1-armbru@redhat.com>

On 03/08/19 07:24, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> 
> We reject undersized backends with a rather enigmatic "failed to read
> the initial flash content" error.
> 
> We happily accept oversized images, ignoring their tail.  Throwing
> away parts of firmware that way is pretty much certain to end in an
> even more enigmatic failure to boot.
> 
> Require the backend's size to match the device's size exactly.  Report
> mismatch as "device requires N bytes, block backend 'NAME' provides M
> bytes".
> 
> Improve the error for actual read failures to "can't read initial
> flash content from block backend 'NAME'.
> 
> We disabled code to limit device sizes to 8, 16, 32 or 64MiB more than
> a decade ago in commit 95d1f3edd5e and c8b153d7949, v0.9.1.  Bury.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> index 9d1c356eb6..2e3a05c0b3 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> @@ -730,13 +730,6 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>      device_len = sector_len_per_device * blocks_per_device;
>  
> -    /* XXX: to be fixed */
> -#if 0
> -    if (total_len != (8 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (16 * 1024 * 1024) &&
> -        total_len != (32 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (64 * 1024 * 1024))
> -        return NULL;
> -#endif
> -
>      memory_region_init_rom_device(
>          &pfl->mem, OBJECT(dev),
>          &pflash_cfi01_ops,
> @@ -763,12 +756,32 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>  
>      if (pfl->blk) {
> +        /*
> +         * Validate the backing store is the right size for pflash
> +         * devices. If the user supplies a larger file we ignore the
> +         * tail.
> +         */
> +        int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(pfl->blk);
> +
> +        if (backing_len < 0) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "can't get size of block backend '%s'",
> +                       blk_name(pfl->blk));
> +            return;
> +        }
> +        if (backing_len != total_len) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "device requires %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
> +                       "block backend '%s' provides %" PRIu64 " bytes",
> +                       total_len, blk_name(pfl->blk), backing_len);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
>          /* read the initial flash content */
>          ret = blk_pread(pfl->blk, 0, pfl->storage, total_len);
> -
>          if (ret < 0) {
>              vmstate_unregister_ram(&pfl->mem, DEVICE(pfl));
> -            error_setg(errp, "failed to read the initial flash content");
> +            error_setg(errp, "can't read initial flash content"
> +                       " from block backend '%s'",
> +                       blk_name(pfl->blk));
>              return;
>          }
>      }
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> index 33779ce807..45b88d65d8 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> @@ -550,12 +550,6 @@ static void pflash_cfi02_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>  
>      chip_len = pfl->sector_len * pfl->nb_blocs;
> -    /* XXX: to be fixed */
> -#if 0
> -    if (total_len != (8 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (16 * 1024 * 1024) &&
> -        total_len != (32 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (64 * 1024 * 1024))
> -        return NULL;
> -#endif
>  
>      memory_region_init_rom_device(&pfl->orig_mem, OBJECT(pfl), pfl->be ?
>                                    &pflash_cfi02_ops_be : &pflash_cfi02_ops_le,
> @@ -581,11 +575,32 @@ static void pflash_cfi02_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>  
>      if (pfl->blk) {
> +        /*
> +         * Validate the backing store is the right size for pflash
> +         * devices. If the user supplies a larger file we ignore the
> +         * tail.
> +         */
> +        int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(pfl->blk);
> +
> +        if (backing_len < 0) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "can't get size of block backend '%s'",
> +                       blk_name(pfl->blk));
> +            return;
> +        }
> +        if (backing_len != chip_len) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "device requires %" PRIu32 " bytes, "
> +                       "block backend '%s' provides %" PRIu64 " bytes",
> +                       chip_len, blk_name(pfl->blk), backing_len);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
>          /* read the initial flash content */
>          ret = blk_pread(pfl->blk, 0, pfl->storage, chip_len);
>          if (ret < 0) {
> -            vmstate_unregister_ram(&pfl->orig_mem, DEVICE(pfl));
> -            error_setg(errp, "failed to read the initial flash content");
> +            vmstate_unregister_ram(&pfl->mem, DEVICE(pfl));
> +            error_setg(errp, "can't read initial flash content"
> +                       " from block backend '%s'",
> +                       blk_name(pfl->blk));
>              return;
>          }
>      }
> 

This one has got to be one of the longest bike-shedding sessions! :)

I'm fine with this patch, but I could suggest two improvements.

(1) When blk_getlength() fails, we could format the negative error code
returned by it into the error message.

(2) We could extract the common code to a new function in
"hw/block/block.c". (It says "Common code for block device models" on
the tin.)


I realize the vmstate_unregister_ram() rollbacks are not identical
between cfi01 and cfi02. However, that difference only draws my
attention to the fact that the unregister calls are not made on the
other error branches in this patch anyway!

So we should have a common function like this:

void pflash_cfi_read_initial_content(BlockBackend *blk, uint64_t size,
                                     void *buf, Error **errp)
{
    int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(blk);
    int ret;

    if (backing_len < 0) {
        error_setg(...);
        return;
    }

    if (backing_len != size) {
        error_setg(...);
        return;
    }

    ret = blk_pread(blk, 0, buf, size);
    if (ret < 0) {
        error_setg(...);
    }
}

And at the call sites, we can do

    if (pfl->blk) {
        Error *local_err = NULL;

        pflash_cfi_read_initial_content(pfl->blk,
                                        total_len OR chip_len,
                                        pfl->storage,
                                        &local_err);
        if (local_err) {
            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
            vmstate_unregister_ram(...); // as appropriate for cfiXX
            return;
        }
    }

Thanks
Laszlo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-08  6:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7] pflash: Require backend size to match device, improve errors Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 10:00 ` Alex Bennée
2019-03-08 12:16   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 11:47 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-03-08 12:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 13:35     ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-08 14:09       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-08 14:26       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-08 14:29       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 15:40         ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-08 16:45           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-08 17:03           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 17:18             ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-08 18:51           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-09  9:20             ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 14:40   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=481d398a-e26c-6c0a-20b7-7466ae1ebf1f@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).