From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuTsc-0000YB-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 10:47:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuTsZ-0000WB-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 10:47:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43975 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JuTsZ-0000Vd-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 10:47:23 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:51397 helo=mail.wrs.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JuTsX-0005q5-Hm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 10:47:22 -0400 Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.wrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m49ElI1B025008 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 07:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <482463F7.3050407@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:47:19 -0500 From: Jason Wessel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debugging vmlinux with qemu and gdb. Unable to step, next, print or to get any information.. References: <824D057211107844BA95DB341B4BF12E01139BF2@hanvsmail04.eu.thmulti.com> <4823D56F.1010600@windriver.com> <20080509144029.GA32414@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080509144029.GA32414@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:39:11PM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: > >> +@item maintenance packet qqemu.sstepbits >> > > Are these packets in wide use yet? If not, I'd really recommend you > use qRcmd instead; then the GDB command is just "monitor", e.g. > "monitor show sstepbits". maint packet isn't really intended for > users. > > I highly doubt there is any kind of wide spread use here. This is qemu specific and at that, it is really low level. Because you mentioned it though I'll have a look. I seem to recall there was some kind of encoding for monitor packets which should be straight forward enough. Thanks, Jason.