From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: William Roche <william.roche@oracle.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, philmd@linaro.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
imammedo@redhat.com, eduardo@habkost.net,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, wangyanan55@huawei.com,
zhao1.liu@intel.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:25:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4825dc70-bca4-437f-a406-df0936aada85@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5789e2c-e4e1-4203-8b0a-d7aba461497d@oracle.com>
On 06.12.24 19:26, William Roche wrote:
> On 12/3/24 16:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 03.12.24 15:39, William Roche wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Our new Qemu code is testing first the fallocate+MADV_DONTNEED procedure
>>> for standard sized pages (in ram_block_discard_range()) and only folds
>>> back to the mmap() use if it fails. So maybe my proposal to implement:
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Fold back to using mmap(), but it should not
>>> repair a
>>> + * shared file memory region. In this case we fail.
>>> + */
>>> + if (block->fd >= 0 && qemu_ram_is_shared(block)) {
>>> + error_report("Shared memory poison recovery
>>> failure addr: "
>>> + RAM_ADDR_FMT "@" RAM_ADDR_FMT "",
>>> + length, addr);
>>> + exit(1);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> Could be the right choice.
>>
>> Right. But then, what about a mmap(MAP_PRIVATE, shmem), where the
>> pagecache page is poisoned and needs an explicit fallocate? :)
>>
>> It's all tricky. I wonder if we should just say "if it's backed by a
>> file, and we cannot discard, then mmap() can't fix it reliably".
>>
>> if (block->fd >= 0) {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> After all, we don't even expect the fallocate/MADV_DONTNEED to ever
>> fail :) So I was also wondering if we could get rid of the
>> mmap(MAP_FIXED) completely ... but who knows what older Linux kernels do.
>
Hi,
> I agree that we expect the ram_block_discard_range() function to be
> working on recent kernels, and to do what's necessary to reuse the
> poisoned memory area.
>
> The case where older kernels could be a problem is where fallocate()
> would not work on a given file
In that case we cannot possibly handle it correctly in all with
mmap(MAP_FIXED), especially not with shmem/hugetlb :/
So failing is correct.
, or madvice(MADV_DONTNEED or MADV_REMOVE)
> would not work on standard sized pages.
I assume both can be expected to work in any reasonable Linux setup
today (-hugetlb) :)
> As ram_block_discard_range()
> currently avoids using madvise on huge pages.
Right, because support might not be around for hugetlb.
>
> In this case, the generic/minimal way to make the memory usable again
> (in all cases) would be to:
> - fallocate/PUNCH_HOLE the given file (if any)
> - and remap the area
> even if it's not _mandatory_ in all cases.
>
> Would you like me to add an fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) call in the helper
> function qemu_ram_remap_mmap() when a file descriptor is provided
> (before remapping the area) ?
> > This way, we don't need to know if ram_block_discard_range() failed on
> the fallocate() or the madvise(); in the worst case scenario, we would
> PUNCH twice. If fallocate fails or mmap fails, we exit.
> I haven't seen a problem punching a file twice - do you see any problem ?
Hm. I'd like to avoid another fallocate(). It would really only make
sense if we expect fallocate() to work but madvise() to fail; and I
don't think that's our expectation.
virtio-balloon has been using ram_block_discard_range() forever, and so
far nobody really ever reported any of the errors from the function to
the best of my knowledge ...
>
> Do you find this possibility acceptable ? Or should I just go for the
> immediate failure when ram_block_discard_range() fails on a case with a
> file descriptor as you suggest ?
>
> Please let me know if you find any problem with this approach, as it
> could help to have this poison recovery scenario to work on more kernels.
I'd say, let's keep it simple. Try ram_block_discard_range() if that
fails (a) and we have a file, bail out, (b) we don't have a file, do the
remap().
If we ever run into issues with that approach, we can investigate why it
fails and what to do about it (e.g., fallocate).
My best guess it that the whole remap part can be avoided completely.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 9:07 [RFC 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 1/6] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 2/6] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage sizes “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 3/6] system/physmem: Remap memory pages on reset based on the page size “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 4/6] system: Introducing hugetlbfs largepage RAS feature “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 5/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Handle madvise SIGBUS signal on listener “William Roche
2024-09-10 9:07 ` [RFC 6/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Replay lost BUS_MCEERR_AO signals on VM resume “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 1/6] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 2/6] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage sizes “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 3/6] system/physmem: Remap memory pages on reset based on the page size “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 4/6] system: Introducing hugetlbfs largepage RAS feature “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 5/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Handle madvise SIGBUS signal on listener “William Roche
2024-09-10 10:02 ` [RFC RESEND 6/6] system/hugetlb_ras: Replay lost BUS_MCEERR_AO signals on VM resume “William Roche
2024-09-10 11:36 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 16:24 ` William Roche
2024-09-11 22:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 17:07 ` William Roche
2024-09-19 16:52 ` William Roche
2024-10-09 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2024-10-10 20:35 ` William Roche
2024-10-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] accel/kvm: SIGBUS handler should also deal with si_addr_lsb “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage page_size “William Roche
2024-10-23 7:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:27 ` William Roche
2024-10-28 16:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-30 1:56 ` William Roche
2024-11-04 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:30 ` William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] system/physmem: Largepage punch hole before reset of memory pages “William Roche
2024-10-23 7:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-25 23:27 ` William Roche
2024-10-28 17:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-30 1:56 ` William Roche
2024-11-04 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] accel/kvm: Keep track of the HWPoisonPage page_size “William Roche
2024-11-12 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 21:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2024-11-12 11:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-11-12 11:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-15 21:03 ` William Roche
2024-11-18 9:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2024-11-12 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-12 18:17 ` William Roche
2024-11-12 22:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-07 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2024-10-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-10-28 16:32 ` [RFC RESEND 0/6] hugetlbfs largepage RAS project David Hildenbrand
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hwpoison_page_list and qemu_ram_remap are based of pages “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2024-11-25 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2024-12-02 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlbfs memory HW error fixes William Roche
2024-12-02 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 0:15 ` William Roche
2024-12-03 14:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-03 14:39 ` William Roche
2024-12-03 15:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-06 18:26 ` William Roche
2024-12-09 21:25 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] hwpoison_page_list and qemu_ram_remap are based on pages “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:15 ` William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:56 ` William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] c David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM William Roche
2024-12-14 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] system/physmem: Memory settings applied on remap notification “William Roche
2025-01-08 21:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:57 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-08 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 20:55 ` William Roche
2025-01-10 21:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] " “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] system/physmem: handle hugetlb correctly in qemu_ram_remap() “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-28 18:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] system/physmem: poisoned memory discard on reboot “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] accel/kvm: Report the loss of a large memory page “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-28 18:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] numa: Introduce and use ram_block_notify_remap() “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] hostmem: Factor out applying settings “William Roche
2025-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] hostmem: Handle remapping of RAM “William Roche
2025-01-14 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
2025-01-14 14:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Poisoned memory recovery on reboot David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 21:16 ` William Roche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4825dc70-bca4-437f-a406-df0936aada85@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).