From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JvFaa-00056w-0I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 13:44:00 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JvFaX-00056c-I3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 13:43:58 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59779 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JvFaX-00056X-EX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 13:43:57 -0400
Received: from relay3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.77]:59624)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <fabrice@bellard.org>) id 1JvFaX-0003p3-2f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 13:43:57 -0400
Received: from localhost (mfilter4-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.38])
	by relay3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92094BA0B
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 11 May 2008 19:43:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.77])
	by localhost (mfilter4-v.mgt.gandi.net [217.70.178.38]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id Rzc+bNqEEQyv for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;
	Sun, 11 May 2008 19:43:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [84.99.204.158] (158.204.99-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.99.204.158])
	by relay3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F52B9FF
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 11 May 2008 19:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48273023.2010808@bellard.org>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 19:42:59 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES limit
References: <fb249edb0804150435t711078at5598676af6e2e498@mail.gmail.com>	<fb249edb0805110820l6e11d56j5594a412c6e51cc4@mail.gmail.com>	<482717EF.10508@bellard.org>
	<fb249edb0805111018s2ea05438p4f3b5fcde663faae@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0805111018s2ea05438p4f3b5fcde663faae@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> [...]
> Here are some benchmark results:

Benchmarks measuring the boot time mainly measure the dynamic
translation time, so they are not much meaningful. It would be better to
launch say nbench or a compilation with gcc.

Fabrice.