From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JyoJf-0005ki-01 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:25:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JyoJb-0005gf-N2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:25:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40741 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JyoJb-0005gN-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:25:11 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:32117) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jyo1M-0004uc-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 09:06:20 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so146364pyb.10 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 06:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48341E3D.70102@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:06:05 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Sensible VNC encodings References: <4833845C.9000603@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 20 May 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Clearly, you have never waited one minute for a full screen update from a > machine half around the planet. > > That is what happens here with hextile + an compressed SSH tunnel, just in > case you thought this was pure speculation. > > It is pretty obvious why, too: generic compression, such as SSH's, will > never outperform specialized compression, such as tight compression. > Tight uses zlib compression in combination with a palette mechanism. Hextile is a palette mechanism so adding zlib compression to it (via ssh) makes it pretty comparable to Tight. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Ciao, > Dscho > >