From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:12:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4836DED7.6090706@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80805230629u301fcc1cu7bdaeb25bc4dfb67@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2671 bytes --]
Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka writes ("[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options"):
>>>> Following up on my earlier proposal to introduce per-machine command
>>>> line options, this version provides a more generic approach. It should
>>>> also be usable for scenarios like per-arch or per-accelerator.
>>> I approve of splitting the code up like this, and having a
>>> table-driven parsing arrangement. But ideally we could get rid of
>>> `index' and the giant switch() statements too. Something more like
>>>
>>> typedef void QEMUOptionParser(struct QEMUOption *option, const char *optarg);
>>>
>>> typedef struct QEMUOption {
>>> const char *name, *helpstring;
>>> QEMUOptionParser handler;
>>> int flags;
>> Ack. This just enforces a bit more effort to convert the existing
>> opts... :->
>>
>>> int int_for_handler;
>>> void *void_for_handler;
>> I don't think there is an need for both. A plain
>>
>> void *parser_opaque;
>>
>> should suffice as the user can perfectly typecast the void to int.
>>
>>> } QEMUOption;
>>>
>>> qemu_register_option_set(const QEMUOption *options);
>> Here I would then suggest
>>
>> qemu_register_option_set(const char *set_name,
>> const QEMUOption *options);
>>
>> to save the chance for visually grouping options.
>
> I don't follow the need for the set_name parameter. This should be in
> the OptionSet structure.
> You mean, joining two groups if they are registered with the same
> name? This can be done by enforcing them to have
> the same "name" parameter in the OptionSet structure. Am I failing to
> understand anything here?
Let's consider this hypothetical scenario:
$ qemu -h
...
Options specific to KQEMU accelerator:
-kernel-kqemu enable KQEMU full virtualization (default is user mode only)
-no-kqemu disable KQEMU kernel module usage
...
The registration will work like this:
QEMUOption kqemu_options[] = {
{ "kernel-kqemu", "enable KQEMU...", kqemu_enable_kernel, 0, NULL },
{ "no-kqemu", "disable KQEMU...", kqemu_disable, 0, NULL },
{ NULL }
};
...
cpu_get_phys_page_debug("KQEMU accelerator", kqemu_options);
The set name is then kept in the _private_ QEMUOptionSet structure that
is created and hooked into the global list by cpu_get_phys_page_debug.
Joining groups with identical names, at least for the help output, was
not planned yet. Might be a useful extension, but I would wait for
feedback on use cases first.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-23 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 23:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 19:17 ` Glauber Costa
2008-05-21 20:58 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-22 10:11 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 10:19 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 10:20 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-23 13:29 ` Glauber Costa
2008-05-23 15:12 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4836DED7.6090706@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).