From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K1Fj9-00077l-Sq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:05:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K1Fj8-00075f-2o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:05:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33269 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1Fj7-00075V-R0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:05:37 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:57976)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <kwolf@suse.de>) id 1K1Fj7-0005bT-7a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:05:37 -0400
Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de)
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@suse.de>) id 1K1Fj5-0005Lz-AT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:05:35 -0400
Message-ID: <483D0355.7000100@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:01:41 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH][v2] Align file accesses with	cache=off
	(O_DIRECT)
References: <1211283126.4314.70.camel@frecb07144>	<48332AB9.3010707@codemonkey.ws>
	<1211533925.4302.3.camel@frecb07144>
In-Reply-To: <1211533925.4302.3.camel@frecb07144>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

Laurent Vivier schrieb:
> As this patch has been approved by Anthony and all comments of Fabrice
> on the previous patch have been addressed, could it be commited to the
> SVN repository ?

And still no answer... See, that's what I meant when I said that patches 
are completely ignored until they are committed. And only then the 
reasons are given why it hasn't been committed.

Blue Swirl, Paul, Fabrice: Do any of you have additional comments or why 
don't you commit this patch?

Kevin