From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1QCW-0002gi-Ar for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:16:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1QCU-0002fw-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:16:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37141 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1QCU-0002fs-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:16:38 -0400 Received: from relay2-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.76]:55924) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1QCU-0003Sg-1V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 14:16:38 -0400 Message-ID: <483DA143.9070404@bellard.org> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:15:31 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [4609] moved halted field to CPU_COMMON References: <5d6222a80805281024n2adecb8bt9adf931151ae88fe@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80805281024n2adecb8bt9adf931151ae88fe@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: glommer@gmail.com Glauber Costa wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Fabrice Bellard wrote: >> Revision: 4609 >> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=4609 >> Author: bellard >> Date: 2008-05-28 17:14:10 +0000 (Wed, 28 May 2008) >> >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> moved halted field to CPU_COMMON > > It is very good to have it commited, but I feel really embarassed to > see no mention to me at all in the changelog. > Even if it is a slightly modified version of the patch itself > (although this one seems more like a subset), giving credit to the > work I've done is a good thing. At the very least, > it will keep developers around and motivated. Sorry but I did redo this particular patch and I may redo the others as well as it is faster for me to write them as I'd like to see them rather than discussing on the mailing list. Moreover, I consider your patches as cosmetic and as such I see no problem in not mentionning the author. Regards, Fabrice.