From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KQEMU code organization
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:47:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483EEC20.5030606@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <483EDE5E.2000807@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> Virtio on x86 requires no special host-kernel support, IIRC. But, yeah,
> in-kernel irqchip (including APIC) is a further incentive to motivate
> such step.
>
> But - this is all nice on the drawing board. It just requires a
> reasonable balance between required effort (wouldn't be small, I guess)
> and future relevance. For x86, by AMD and Intel at least (not sure about
> VIA right now),
As of the recently announced Isaiah microarchitecture, VIA includes
support for VT.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> you see hardware virtualization in every new processor.
> So kqemu becomes less and less relevant over the time. The thrilling
> question is: Is that period long enough to justify a kqemu / soft-kvm,
> and to push the result mainline?
>
> Jan
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-27 16:56 [Qemu-devel] KQEMU code organization Jan Kiszka
2008-05-27 17:20 ` Ben Taylor
2008-05-27 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-27 20:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-27 21:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-27 22:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-28 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-28 16:37 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-28 16:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-28 18:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-29 12:29 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-29 13:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-29 16:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-05-29 16:26 ` Paul Brook
2008-05-29 16:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-05-29 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-05-29 21:46 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-30 3:32 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2008-05-30 8:14 ` Andreas Färber
2008-05-29 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-05-29 16:53 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-29 17:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-05-31 10:18 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-02 16:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-05-29 21:52 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-31 10:06 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-01 22:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-02 9:02 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-06-02 13:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-05-29 16:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-29 17:47 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483EEC20.5030606@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).