From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3xWN-0002OI-Dp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:15:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3xWM-0002M9-BM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:15:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35977 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3xWL-0002Lb-Qz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:15:37 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:42157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3xWL-0006Ud-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:15:37 -0400 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0B9DFFBEE6 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:15:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [88.65.37.28] (helo=[139.25.109.167]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.109 #226) id 1K3xWK-00073F-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:15:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4846DBC8.1090301@web.de> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:15:36 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48357281.1090501@web.de> <20080604132556.GA28895@mx.loc> In-Reply-To: <20080604132556.GA28895@mx.loc> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDC9171879B541AFED22199B5" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enhance sendkey with key hold time Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDC9171879B541AFED22199B5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:16:48PM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote: >> On 22/05/2008, Jan Kiszka wrote: >=20 >>> +static void release_keys(void *opaque) >>> +{ >>> + int keycode; >>> + >>> + while (nb_pending_keycodes > 0) { >=20 > Perhaps just doing a post decrement on the nb_pending would be cleaner.= I prefer a separate statement for this but... >=20 >>> + keycode =3D keycodes[nb_pending_keycodes-1]; >>> + if (keycode & 0x80) >>> + kbd_put_keycode(0xe0); >>> + kbd_put_keycode(keycode | 0x80); >>> + nb_pending_keycodes--; >>> + } I agree that code reordering can save us the "-1". Thanks, Jan --------------enigDC9171879B541AFED22199B5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIRtvIniDOoMHTA+kRAlWmAJ96/KyQYW6u70ZXyF/iGjcDg5punACeIJkt 1TCI2cNWxANewYRYPzUz1/o= =ZBPR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDC9171879B541AFED22199B5--