From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8FFq-00028O-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:00:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8FFo-00028C-TE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:00:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56311 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8FFo-000289-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:00:16 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:23128) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8FFo-0002gV-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:00:16 -0400 Message-ID: <485671ED.2050909@qumranet.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:00:13 -0700 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot Failure (CDROM boot failure code : 0004) References: <874p7tinv3.fsf@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr> In-Reply-To: <874p7tinv3.fsf@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: yazicivo@ttmail.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Volkan YAZICI wrote: > root:~# /home/windows/qemu/bin/qemu -boot d \ > > -cdrom /home/windows/windows-server-2003-standard-x86-64-sp2.iso \ > > -hda /home/windows/disk-qcow-20g.img \ > > -localtime -m 512 -L /home/windows/qemu/share/qemu > > qemu complains that > > QEMU BIOS - build: 02/08/07 > $Revision: 1.174 $ $Date: 2006/10/17 16:48:05 $ > Options: apmbios pcibios eltorito rombios32 > > ata0 master: QEMU HARDDISK ATA-7 Hard-Disk (20480 MBytes) > ata1 master: QEMU CD-ROM ATAPI-4 Cd-Rom/Dvd-Rom > > CDROM boot failure code : 0004 > Boot from Cd-Rom failed > FATAL: Could not read the boot disk > > You need to use qemu-system-x86_64 for 64-bit guests. However, that problem doesn't quite fit the error you get. Worth trying though. Is the cd image mountable on the host? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.