From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8JSq-00038f-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8JSo-00038J-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:29:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40119 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8JSo-00038C-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:29:58 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:47397) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8JSo-0006B4-2U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:29:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4856B122.8010508@qumranet.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:29:54 -0700 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Boot Failure (CDROM boot failure code : 0004) References: <874p7tinv3.fsf@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr> <87zlplh68t.fsf_-_@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr> <20080616172649.GP20851@kernel.dk> <200806161849.26294.paul@codesourcery.com> <20080616180027.GQ20851@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <20080616180027.GQ20851@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Laurent Vivier , Paul Brook Jens Axboe wrote: > I was slightly off, in hindsight, didn't think properly about that > before replying :-) > > The dd image should indeed be bootable, but a burned version of the > image will not be. Why is that? What's different in the ripped image compared to the image used to burn the CD? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.