From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K8jTk-0003oS-6V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:16:40 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K8jTi-0003mS-5o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:16:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41562 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8jTh-0003m8-Va
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:16:38 -0400
Received: from relay4-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.78]:50180)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <fabrice@bellard.org>) id 1K8j6G-0003uT-6S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:52:24 -0400
Message-ID: <485831C4.4000107@bellard.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:51:00 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: loadvm and APIC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806170850540.9835@linmac.oyster.ru>	<48576EBE.2030506@siemens.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0806172206020.2110@linmac.oyster.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806172206020.2110@linmac.oyster.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

malc wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> 
>> malc wrote:
>>> Here's the scenario:
>>>
> 
> [..snip..]
> 
>>
>> That is basically
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/26215, which I
>> would prefer.
> 
> Yes, i never paid enough attention to that patch, and it does indeed
> look better.

No. This is a hack which does not fix the real problem. At least saving
and restoring "interrupt_pending" would bring us closer to a better
solution.

Fabrice.