From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: xuquan8@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pss.wulizhen@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] colo-compare: release all unhandled packets in finalize function
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:47:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485b2b76-3efb-45d0-155f-7d56f80f3df6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58A511D2.6020102@huawei.com>
On 2017年02月16日 10:43, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
> On 2017/2/16 10:34, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年02月15日 16:34, zhanghailiang wrote:
>>> We should release all unhandled packets before finalize colo compare.
>>> Besides, we need to free connection_track_table, or there will be
>>> a memory leak bug.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/colo-compare.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
>>> index a16e2d5..809bad3 100644
>>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>>> @@ -676,6 +676,23 @@ static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable
>>> *uc, Error **errp)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void colo_release_packets(void *opaque, void *user_data)
>>> +{
>>> + CompareState *s = user_data;
>>> + Connection *conn = opaque;
>>> + Packet *pkt = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->primary_list)) {
>>> + pkt = g_queue_pop_head(&conn->primary_list);
>>> + compare_chr_send(&s->chr_out, pkt->data, pkt->size);
>>
>> Any reason to send packets here?
>>
>
> Yes, considering the usage case which we shut COLO for
> the VM to make it as a normal VM without FT.
> We need to remove all the filter objects. In this case,
> IMHO, it is necessary to release the unhandled packets.
>
>
> Thanks.
Right, I see. All other patches looks good let's squash this into 2.
Thanks
>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> + packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
>>> + }
>>> + while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->secondary_list)) {
>>> + pkt = g_queue_pop_head(&conn->secondary_list);
>>> + packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void colo_compare_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>> {
>>> UserCreatableClass *ucc = USER_CREATABLE_CLASS(oc);
>>> @@ -707,9 +724,12 @@ static void colo_compare_finalize(Object *obj)
>>> g_main_loop_quit(s->compare_loop);
>>> qemu_thread_join(&s->thread);
>>>
>>> + /* Release all unhandled packets after compare thead exited */
>>> + g_queue_foreach(&s->conn_list, colo_release_packets, s);
>>>
>>> g_queue_free(&s->conn_list);
>>>
>>> + g_hash_table_destroy(s->connection_track_table);
>>> g_free(s->pri_indev);
>>> g_free(s->sec_indev);
>>> g_free(s->outdev);
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-15 8:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] colo-compare: fix some bugs zhanghailiang
2017-02-15 8:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] colo-compare: use g_timeout_source_new() to process the stale packets zhanghailiang
2017-02-15 8:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] colo-compare: kick compare thread to exit while finalize zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 2:25 ` Zhang Chen
2017-02-16 2:34 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-16 2:45 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-15 8:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] colo-compare: release all unhandled packets in finalize function zhanghailiang
2017-02-16 2:27 ` Zhang Chen
2017-02-16 5:25 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-16 2:34 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-16 2:43 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-16 2:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-02-15 8:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] char: remove the right fd been watched in qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() zhanghailiang
2017-02-15 8:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] colo-compare: Fix removing fds been watched incorrectly in finalization zhanghailiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485b2b76-3efb-45d0-155f-7d56f80f3df6@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=pss.wulizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xuquan8@huawei.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).