From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@suse.de
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RESENT][PATCH 2/2] x86: Issue reset on triple faults
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:39:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486096B2.1000407@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080623160047.GB16803@shareable.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2040 bytes --]
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> It might be worth distinguishing between
>>> triple-fault-used-by-guest-for-context-switch and triple faults which
>>> trigger a normal reset, and log only the latter. There's a
>>> standardish way of distinguishing them, which the BIOS should check.
>> You refer to setting some return address at some magic BIOS location?
>
> Probably; I forget the details. There might be a CMOS byte, too.
I checked some old documents: It's a combination of both. Some CMOS byte
(0x0f) signals the special reset, and a pointer in the BIOS memory
(0x40:0x67) describes the desired jump target.
>
>> Isn't this something the BIOS should handle, not QEMU?
>
> The BIOS should handle it, yes. But since it is standard behaviour,
> it might be useful for QEMU to decide whether to _log_ the event as a
> system reset based on that state.
Yeah, meanwhile my brain seems to work again and actually read what you
mean.
But I'm still not convinced that we should make a special case about
this in the QEMU core. The user is not forced to enable reset logging,
and maybe (s)he _does_ want to log also resets due to protected mode
exits - what then? Keep it simple, just log what actually happens if
logging is enabled.
>
> Same for keyboard controller induced reset - that's also used for
> context switching, in the same way. (Triple fault is only used
> because it's faster.)
>
> Same also for deciding whether -no-reboot should close down the QEMU
> process. Now I think about it, that is the best reason to distinguish
> them!
>
>>> When helper(SVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN, 0) is called, should it still also call
>>> qemu_system_reset_request()?
>> helper_vmexit() is not expected to return (cpu_loop_exit).
>
> Ok. It's not clear unless you know the code, which I don't. Just
> wanted to check :-)
Understanding the usage of setjmp/longjmp in QEMU is a key to grasp the
control flow - but it took me some time as well to realize this. :)
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 258 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-23 15:15 [Qemu-devel] [RESENT][PATCH 2/2] x86: Issue reset on triple faults Jan Kiszka
2008-06-23 15:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-23 15:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-23 16:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-23 20:01 ` Natalia Portillo
2008-06-24 6:39 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-06-24 8:18 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486096B2.1000407@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kwolf@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).