From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Fix time drift problem under high load when PIT is in use.
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:40:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48679EEB.7020500@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080629140225.5626.16864.stgit@gleb-debian.qumranet.com.qumranet.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2262 bytes --]
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Count the number of interrupts that was lost due to interrupt coalescing
> and re-inject them back when possible. This fixes time drift problem when
> pit is used as a time source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com>
> ---
>
> hw/i8254.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i8254.c b/hw/i8254.c
> index 4813b03..c4f0f46 100644
> --- a/hw/i8254.c
> +++ b/hw/i8254.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ static PITState pit_state;
>
> static void pit_irq_timer_update(PITChannelState *s, int64_t current_time);
>
> +static uint32_t pit_irq_coalesced;
> +
> static int pit_get_count(PITChannelState *s)
> {
> uint64_t d;
> @@ -369,12 +371,28 @@ static void pit_irq_timer_update(PITChannelState *s, int64_t current_time)
> return;
> expire_time = pit_get_next_transition_time(s, current_time);
> irq_level = pit_get_out1(s, current_time);
> - qemu_set_irq(s->irq, irq_level);
> + if(irq_level) {
> + if(!qemu_irq_raise(s->irq))
> + pit_irq_coalesced++;
> + } else {
> + qemu_irq_lower(s->irq);
> + if(pit_irq_coalesced > 0) {
> + if(qemu_irq_raise(s->irq))
> + pit_irq_coalesced--;
> + qemu_irq_lower(s->irq);
> + }
> + }
That's graspable for my poor brain: reinject one coalesced IRQ right
after the falling edge of an in-time delivery...
> +
> #ifdef DEBUG_PIT
> printf("irq_level=%d next_delay=%f\n",
> irq_level,
> (double)(expire_time - current_time) / ticks_per_sec);
> #endif
> + if(pit_irq_coalesced && expire_time != -1) {
> + uint32_t div = ((pit_irq_coalesced >> 10) & 0x7f) + 2;
> + expire_time -= ((expire_time - current_time) / div);
> + }
> +
... but could you comment on this algorithm? I think I got what it does:
splitting up the next regular period in short intervals. But there are a
bit too many magic numbers involved. Where do they come from? What
happens if pit_irq_coalesced becomes large (or: how large can it become
without risking an IRQ storm on the guest)? A few comments would help, I
guess.
Thanks,
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-29 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-29 14:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix guest time drift under heavy load Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Change qemu_set_irq() to return status information Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:14 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-29 14:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:53 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 15:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:38 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 15:40 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 18:11 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 19:44 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 20:34 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 20:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-30 13:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-30 14:00 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-30 14:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-30 14:35 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 20:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-29 21:16 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-29 21:42 ` Dor Laor
2008-06-29 21:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-06-29 21:54 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-30 13:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Fix time drift problem under high load when PIT is in use Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:40 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-06-29 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Fix time drift problem under high load when RTC " Gleb Natapov
2008-06-29 14:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix guest time drift under heavy load Jan Kiszka
[not found] <20080629135455.5447.90849.stgit@gleb-debian.qumranet.com.qumranet.com>
[not found] ` <20080629135917.5447.7163.stgit@gleb-debian.qumranet.com.qumranet.com>
2008-06-29 20:56 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Fix time drift problem under high load when PIT is in use Dor Laor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48679EEB.7020500@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).