From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGx0k-0006L7-O7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:20:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGx0k-0006KA-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:20:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45387 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGx0k-0006Ju-1g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:20:42 -0400 Received: from dbservice.com ([213.239.204.14]:45935 helo=matterhorn.dbservice.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGx0j-0005YM-LF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:20:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.27] (gw.ptr-62-65-141-13.customer.ch.netstream.com [62.65.141.13]) by matterhorn.dbservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FD520BB3C5 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:20:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48761A9C.80207@dbservice.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:20:12 +0200 From: Tomas Carnecky MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug in SDL key event processing References: <48754975.1050303@dbservice.com> <20080709233752.GL4889@implementation> <48754DF2.2010704@dbservice.com> <20080709235516.GM4889@implementation> <48755320.5090707@dbservice.com> <48757FB8.8010400@codemonkey.ws> <4875C0B6.2060302@dbservice.com> <4876101A.1080800@codemonkey.ws> <487611FC.5070500@dbservice.com> <487616BB.8020402@dbservice.com> <20080710141027.GH4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <20080710141027.GH4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Samuel Thibault wrote: > Tomas Carnecky, le Thu 10 Jul 2008 16:03:39 +0200, a =C3=A9crit : >> Am I the only one who uses the evdev driver and runs QEMU? I can't=20 >> believe that. >=20 > evdev has been experimental for quite a long time. I don't know e.g. a > distribution that uses it by default. I hence wouldn't be surprised. It's used by default if the xserver runs on Linux and uses=20 auto-configuration (hald). That feature has been added in xorg 7.2 or=20 so. Evdev is actually the preferred way to talk to keyboards and such=20 under Linux. It has been stable for a couple years now (since 2.6?), and=20 I've been using it ever since I remember it was available in the kernel. tom