From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKguL-0005Dy-SR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:57:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKguK-0005Dj-B4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:57:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46072 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KKguK-0005Dg-6T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:57:32 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:54169) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KKguK-0000LP-8u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:57:32 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so872401pyb.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4883B4A8.9080402@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:56:56 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] kvm: qemu: fix vga screendump References: <1216329580-20804-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1216329580-20804-6-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4882A407.5060004@codemonkey.ws> <4883867B.5000000@codemonkey.ws> <488395FE.3070500@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org andrzej zaborowski wrote: > 2008/7/20 Anthony Liguori : > >> andrzej zaborowski wrote: >> >>> 2008/7/20 Anthony Liguori : >>> >>> >>>> andrzej zaborowski wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> 2008/7/20 Anthony Liguori : >>>>> With -no-graphic there's no ds->data, or it can have lower bpp than >>>>> what's otherwise available. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Screen dumping with -no-graphic probably should just show a black screen >>>> anyway. >>>> >>>> >>> I thought this was the main use case. You shouldn't need sdl installed >>> to perform the tests Avi talked about. >>> >>> >> You could still just do -vnc none to achieve the same effect. >> > > What I mean is it should be totally independent of that and of X on > host, if you want to perform comparisons on the bitmaps (and for > various other reasons). > -vnc none gives a consistent depth of 32-bit. FWIW, I have a different approach to doing what Avi describes that uses a VNC client. The advantage of this is that you can have a lot more control over the pixel format to avoid this sort of problem in the first place. Regards, Anthony Liguori