From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com>
Cc: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:17:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488DF11D.7090100@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728160215.GB23771@minantech.com>
Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> CMOS has enough memory for UUID, but UUID is not the only thing that
> needs to be passed to BIOS, so eventually we can run out of space there.
>
I'm inclined to think that on a real machine, the UUID is stored in the
CMOS.
> For example we have a requirement to pass additional ACPI tables that
> user may specify on command line.
What's the use-case? I don't think this is a very good idea.
> There is no enough space to put those
> tables into CMOS. What I did is that: BIOS passes to qemu address where to
> store additional tables (via backdoor) and qemu copies them there. To
> this scheme to work there should be bidirectional channel between qemu
> and BIOS. Other then that I am not particularly attached to vmware
> backdoor :)
>
You can not arbitrarily extend the backdoor interface. It's an
interface defined and controlled by VMware. If you extend it, you risk
breaking other OSes that are assuming that interface has a different
meaning.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> --
> Gleb.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 13:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 14:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 14:41 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:09 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:42 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 16:02 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 16:17 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-07-28 16:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 17:41 ` Blue Swirl
2008-07-28 16:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 19:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 20:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 20:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 20:40 ` Paul Brook
2008-07-28 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 6:31 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-28 15:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 19:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sebastian Herbszt
2008-07-28 15:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2008-07-28 16:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-28 15:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-29 19:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 19:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-30 17:32 ` Blue Swirl
2008-08-05 14:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-08-06 2:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-06 16:26 ` Blue Swirl
2008-08-06 16:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-06 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sebastian Herbszt
2008-08-06 22:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-07-29 8:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-29 8:42 ` Chris Lalancette
2008-07-28 15:51 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488DF11D.7090100@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=clalance@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@qumranet.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).