From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] make check speed
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:01:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48906779-cd74-bfe6-1e4a-4678eb2d0a0d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dafbe774-2544-f64e-aad2-9cf957025e8d@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2910 bytes --]
On 23.08.2017 13:51, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> Dne 23.8.2017 v 10:35 Thomas Huth napsal(a):
>> On 23.08.2017 10:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 23/08/2017 09:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> While we're at it: I'd like to have a "make check-fast", too. Sometimes
>>>> the normal "make check" is already too slow, e.g. while developing new
>>>> patches, I sometimes just want to do a very quick sanity test to see
>>>> whether I broke some basic things or not, and only do the "make check"
>>>> before I submit my patches.
>>>> So we would get three stages:
>>>>
>>>> - make check-fast => For very, very quick sanity tests only
>>>>
>>>> - make check => E.g. has to be run before submitting patches
>>>>
>>>> - make check-harder => might run a very long time, so best suited for
>>>> nightly regression tests etc.?
>>>>
>>>> Does that sound reasonable? And the crucial question: Who is going to
>>>> implement the basic framework for this?
>>>
>>> There's already make check-unit or make check-qtest-x86_64 depending on
>>> what you're working on.
>>
>> True. And I just learned that you can also already set the SPEED
>> variable to either "quick" or "slow" and that we're already using
>> g_test_quick() and g_test_slow() in a couple of places to check this. So
>> the framework for running quick vs. thorough tests is already there ...
>> we just might want to add this to some more tests, I guess...
>>
>> Question for the maintainers and the test automation folks: Is anybody
>> already running "make check SPEED=slow" or is this just rather an
>> unheard-of way of running the tests?
>>
>>> If you have a many-core machine, of course, there's no simpler solution
>>> than throwing more CPUs at it. :)
>>
>> Is it safe nowadays to run "make check -j4" for example? Last time I
>> tried (maybe 1 or 2 years ago), there were still issues since some tests
>> were using hard-coded temporary file names, so the parallel tests were
>> disturbing each other, for example...
>>
>
> Actually the `.travis.yml` defines `MAKEFLAGS="-j3"`, which results in `make check` being executed with 3 threads...
>
> I was actually looking at the increasing number of failed travis builds and it seems to be related to the fluctuating performance. Running `nice -n 20 make check -j 12` with `nice -n 5 stress -c 20` in background results in the same kind of failures:
>
> File '/tmp/qemu/include/qapi/qmp/qobject.h'
> Lines executed:0.00% of 9
> **
> ERROR:tests/prom-env-test.c:42:check_guest_memory: assertion failed (signature == MAGIC): (0x7c7f1b78 == 0xcafec0de)
I think you're simply running into timeout issues here since you're
likely overloading the host, I guess. Or does your host have that many CPUs?
If the timeouts are really an issue here, we simply might have to
increase the timeout values a bit again...
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-16 8:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator Cornelia Huck
2017-08-16 8:28 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-16 10:25 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-16 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 11:18 ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-16 11:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-22 1:09 ` David Gibson
2017-08-22 5:40 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-22 8:47 ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-22 8:49 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-08-22 9:35 ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-22 11:20 ` David Gibson
2017-08-22 11:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-23 0:29 ` David Gibson
2017-08-23 7:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-23 7:49 ` [Qemu-devel] make check speed (was: Re: [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator) Thomas Huth
2017-08-23 8:01 ` [Qemu-devel] make check speed Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-23 8:35 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-23 8:52 ` Fam Zheng
2017-08-23 9:09 ` Fam Zheng
2017-08-23 9:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 3:01 ` David Gibson
2017-08-23 11:51 ` Lukáš Doktor
2017-08-23 12:01 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-08-23 12:13 ` Lukáš Doktor
2017-08-24 13:52 ` Cleber Rosa
2017-08-23 12:35 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-23 12:52 ` Lukáš Doktor
2017-08-23 12:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-24 5:27 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-30 8:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-30 9:13 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-30 11:52 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-08-30 13:56 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-30 14:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-08-29 16:34 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-29 17:13 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-16 14:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48906779-cd74-bfe6-1e4a-4678eb2d0a0d@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).