From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PATCH: Control over drive open modes for backing file
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:48:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4893222A.6050101@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080801091809.GJ23993@redhat.com>
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:26:17PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> So while I think it's valid to have a "read-only disk" exposed to the
>> guest, I don't think the user should have anything to do with how we
>> open the file.
>>
>> Is there some specific circumstance you are trying to support?
>>
>
> The scenario is that the admin wants to assign a read only disk to the
> virtual machine - typically the same disk to multiple machines - and
> thus want to guarentee that no one VM can write to it, since bad things
> happen if you do that with non-cluster filesystems.
>
> Controlling this based on the underlying permissions of the file backing
> the drive is not practical. Things like udev happy set permissions on
> devices in /dev/ behind your back, so you'd have to edit the horrible udev
> config files to make /dev/sdXX readonly. It is a far simpler task to
> simply add ,mode=ro to the QEMU command line for -drive to accomplish
> this, than finding the obscure file to edit to make the underling file
> have read only permissions
>
Right, but my point is that ,mode=ro does not have to force QEMU to open
the file O_RDONLY. It simply needs to prevent writes from happening.
But it's important to be able to expose this property to the guest, so
,mode=ro should not be allowed for disks that do not support exposing
their read-only-ness to the guest.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Daniel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 11:31 [Qemu-devel] PATCH: Control over drive open modes for backing file Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-31 12:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 13:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-31 13:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-31 13:46 ` Paul Brook
2008-07-31 13:55 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-31 15:05 ` Blue Swirl
2008-07-31 16:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 16:10 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-07-31 18:07 ` Blue Swirl
2008-07-31 14:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-07-31 18:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-31 18:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-01 7:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-01 15:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-01 9:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-08-01 14:48 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-08-01 16:47 ` Ian Jackson
2008-08-01 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-01 17:10 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4893222A.6050101@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).