From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKTn-0001uo-Qa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:13:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKTh-0001mC-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:13:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59040 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKTg-0001lV-OB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:13:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36219) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQKTf-0007We-S5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:13:20 -0400 Message-ID: <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:12:35 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann , Ian Jackson > I have not had a precise look at e.g. the xenfb.c code, but if what Gerd > has submitted is exactly the same as xen-unstable's, then that part is > already merged :) It isn't exactly the same code. For example the xenbus state engine has been factored out into generic code, shared by all backend drivers. The behaviour should be identical though. cheers, Gerd -- http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/