From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KQMRx-0001vd-R5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KQMRw-0001ux-CG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45088 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQMRw-0001ut-3D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:40 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44168)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1KQMRv-0004SM-O2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:39 -0400
Message-ID: <48985336.2020709@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:18:46 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu
References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws>
	<20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<489835A3.6030804@redhat.com>
	<20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 13:12:35 +0200, a =E9crit :
>>> I have not had a precise look at e.g. the xenfb.c code, but if what G=
erd
>>> has submitted is exactly the same as xen-unstable's, then that part i=
s
>>> already merged :)
>> It isn't exactly the same code.  For example the xenbus state engine h=
as
>> been factored out into generic code, shared by all backend drivers.
>=20
> Then it'd probably be good to push that upstream Xen.

I'm cross-posting the patches to xen-devel for a reason.

Whenever you want to pick them up now or just wait for them appear in
upstream qemu and handle it with the next rebase is your call.  But at
least reviewing and commenting now would be very helpful, so I don't
break things for xen by mistake and we can proceed with merging those bit=
s.

cheers,
  Gerd

--=20
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/