From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOkF-00036A-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:46:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOkE-00034S-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:46:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45026 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOkE-00034D-DX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:46:42 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]:35070) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQOkE-0003VC-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:46:42 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so787756and.130 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489875BC.4020205@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:46:04 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> <20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48985336.2020709@redhat.com> <20080805150328.GT4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault , Gerd Hoffmann , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 16:03:28 +0100, a écrit : > >> Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 15:18:46 +0200, a écrit : >> >> Well, cross-posting qemu patches to xen-devel is not the same as posting >> xen patches to xen-devel... >> > > Just to explain a bit more, now that I have read the patches a bit: what > is there is somehow far from the xen unstable tree, at least because > of the backend driver core, and because of other 'details' (renaming, > moving). I doubt Ian will be happy to have to make the effort to merge > that in his tree and I guess he will probably just drop everything and > keep the xen-unstable version. > Which is why ya'll need to work something out before we apply these patches to QEMU :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori > Samuel >