From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlxw-0003lS-7b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:34:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlxt-0003lG-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:34:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52887 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlxt-0003lD-Ih for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:34:21 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.230]:40901) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQlxt-0001nF-HS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:34:21 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so2557666wra.18 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4899D267.9020007@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:33:43 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option References: <488DC8B2.1070009@redhat.com> <20080728141515.GJ3196@minantech.com> <488DD98D.5010907@codemonkey.ws> <20080728153527.GA23771@minantech.com> <488F6E0E.2070504@codemonkey.ws> <20080729195048.GC11061@minantech.com> <20080805143319.GC3689@minantech.com> <48990DF6.90205@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Gleb Natapov Blue Swirl wrote: > On 8/6/08, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> I like having a configuration blob but am uncomfortable with stashing it in >> memory somewhere. I would think maybe stealing a few IO ports and using >> that to read the rom may be nicer (albeit slower). I think it's something >> that needs to be implemented fully to work out the kinks. >> > > Ok, I made a new version that uses IO ports. But then you have to > select a port instead of address, is that any better? > A lot of the BIOS code is 16-bit and accessing high memory location from 16-bit code is a royal pain. That is simplified with using IO ports. Regards, Anthony Liguori