From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KQrDF-0000zL-3g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:10:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KQrDB-0000u6-FK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:10:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49248 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQrDB-0000tg-27
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:10:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45119)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1KQrDB-0002uw-3p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <489A2144.20004@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:10:12 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits
	into qemu
References: <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<48997981.1030703@redhat.com>
	<20080806102338.GA4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<m37iauxqii.fsf@crossbow.pond.sub.org>
	<20080806125055.GG4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<4899AD19.8060606@redhat.com>
	<20080806140132.GL4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<4899B06F.2090101@redhat.com>
	<20080806142526.GN4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<4899C4CB.2020105@redhat.com>
	<20080806154713.GQ4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080806154713.GQ4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 17:35:39 +0200, a =E9crit :
>>> AGAIN, THERE IS THE IAN JACKSON TREE.
>>>
>>> Thanks for reading.
>> I get build failures when patching THE IAN JACKSON TREE due to THE IAN
>> JACKSON TREE lagging behind upstream.
>=20
> You didn't mention that. "lagging" a few months indeed, while merging
> stuff.  And because xen 4.0 is about to be released, but it will
> probably catch up soon.

Well, for 4.0.x you probably have to branch off anyway, so the release
shouldn't stop catching up with upstream.

> Anyway that's not a reason for not using it, I
> guess the build failures can be fixed more easily than redoing Ian's
> work.

I'm using upstream qemu for development, and I'm not going to change that.

I can adapt the patches for the xen tree.  Having the xen tree *not*
lagging behind would be *very* helpful for keeping the trees and patches
in sync.

cheers,
  Gerd

--=20
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/