From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQrEP-0001rt-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:11:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQrEN-0001qh-Pw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:11:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52485 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQrEN-0001qP-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.234]:13968) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQrEN-00035J-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:11:43 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so134417wra.18 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489A2179.4050506@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:11:05 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <488DC8B2.1070009@redhat.com><20080728141515.GJ3196@minantech.com> <488DD98D.5010907@codemonkey.ws> <20080728153527.GA23771@minantech.com> <488F6E0E.2070504@codemonkey.ws> <20080729195048.GC11061@minantech.com> <20080805143319.GC3689@minantech.com><48990DF6.90205@codemonkey.ws> <4899D267.9020007@codemonkey.ws> <02db01c8f810$f05979a0$0201a8c0@zeug> In-Reply-To: <02db01c8f810$f05979a0$0201a8c0@zeug> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Add UUID command-line option Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Herbszt Cc: Gleb Natapov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> I like having a configuration blob but am uncomfortable with >>>> stashing it in >>>> memory somewhere. I would think maybe stealing a few IO ports and >>>> using >>>> that to read the rom may be nicer (albeit slower). I think it's >>>> something >>>> that needs to be implemented fully to work out the kinks. >>>> >>> >>> Ok, I made a new version that uses IO ports. But then you have to >>> select a port instead of address, is that any better? >>> >> >> A lot of the BIOS code is 16-bit and accessing high memory location >> from 16-bit code is a royal pain. That is simplified with using IO >> ports. > > Could put it in the 0xe000 segment, e.g. 4kb below rombios16.bin at > 0xf000. Which limits the size to 4kb. If we use the IO port patch that Blue Swirl proposed, we have 64kb of space with a pretty reasonable expansion mechanism. Regards, Anthony Liguori > - Sebastian >