From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KTe7A-0005DL-Gd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:47:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KTe78-0005Av-Ht
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:47:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60635 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KTe78-0005Aj-Bq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:47:46 -0400
Received: from mail-gx0-f23.google.com ([209.85.217.23]:44340)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KTe78-0005p3-4N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:47:46 -0400
Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2034347gxk.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48A44569.3050901@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:47:05 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] License issues
References: <BC50165F-2237-454E-A633-05D9DE5BB6E3@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <BC50165F-2237-454E-A633-05D9DE5BB6E3@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Simson Garfinkel wrote:
> Greetings. Yesterday I posted a query regarding the license of some of 
> the .h files.
>
> Basically, all of the image layer files area clearly licensed to have 
> no restrictions, but some of the necessary .h files are missing that 
> license.
>
> Who is responsible for maintaining the license of the .h files?

Whoever originally committed the code. If you look at the LICENSE file, 
I think the safe thing to assume is that if a file doesn't have an 
explicit license associated with it, it is licensed under the GPL.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Regards,
>
>
> Simson Garfinkel
>
>
>