From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KUm7P-00077K-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KUm7J-00070q-NY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:38 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54869 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUm7J-00070H-D5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:37 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:60949)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1KUm7I-0007M9-4N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:36 -0400
Message-ID: <48A860AC.1010307@mail.berlios.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:32:28 +0200
From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Breakage with local APIC routing
References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0808111616530.24820@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0808111616530.24820@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>

Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> due to the change in revision 3371 (well, at that time, CVS was used, 
> which was no better than Subversion) installation of win64 is broken in 
> QEmu.  The commit message reads like this:
>
> 	Don't route PIC interrupts through the local APIC if the local 
> 	APIC config says so. By Ari Kivity.
>
> A bit of research showed that the patch was actually originally from Qing 
> He, but he told me privately that the part that actually broke win64 (the 
> removal of the call to cpu_reset_interrupt(), as opposed to moving that 
> call into the "else" condition) was not part of his patch.
>
> Unfortunately, a lot has been done to the APIC handling in the meantime, 
> so it is not a simple matter of a revert.
>
> Being a complete idiot when it comes to APICs, I have no clue how to fix 
> the issue.
>
> However, I am quite willing to test whatever patch is thrown at me.
>
> Can somebody help?
>
> Thanks,
> Dscho
See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/24739.
EFI BIOS is affected by the same problem.

Regards,
Stefan