From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUnSi-0007LE-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:58:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUnSg-0007I5-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:58:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41065 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUnSg-0007Hm-CI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:58:46 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:60026) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KUnSf-00050p-MO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:58:46 -0400 Message-ID: <48A874DA.1080000@web.de> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:58:34 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48A860AC.1010307@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <48A860AC.1010307@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB99CD9411A992EDB8EB5F2EA" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Breakage with local APIC routing Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB99CD9411A992EDB8EB5F2EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Weil wrote: > Johannes Schindelin schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> due to the change in revision 3371 (well, at that time, CVS was used, = >> which was no better than Subversion) installation of win64 is broken i= n=20 >> QEmu. The commit message reads like this: >> >> Don't route PIC interrupts through the local APIC if the local=20 >> APIC config says so. By Ari Kivity. >> >> A bit of research showed that the patch was actually originally from Q= ing=20 >> He, but he told me privately that the part that actually broke win64 (= the=20 >> removal of the call to cpu_reset_interrupt(), as opposed to moving tha= t=20 >> call into the "else" condition) was not part of his patch. >> >> Unfortunately, a lot has been done to the APIC handling in the meantim= e,=20 >> so it is not a simple matter of a revert. >> >> Being a complete idiot when it comes to APICs, I have no clue how to f= ix=20 >> the issue. >> >> However, I am quite willing to test whatever patch is thrown at me. >> >> Can somebody help? >> >> Thanks, >> Dscho > See also http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/24739. > EFI BIOS is affected by the same problem. >=20 Can you describe a valid test case? I quickly tried http://bellard.org/qemu/efi-bios.tar.bz2 with qemu revision #3370, but I only get "Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x000a0000". Jan --------------enigB99CD9411A992EDB8EB5F2EA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiodOAACgkQniDOoMHTA+m0BQCeIgNMT61iJzC+ewjatvKKeGRM 2t0An1sbOEAiqfuGrPMbcYDFoomuBAUV =scLv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB99CD9411A992EDB8EB5F2EA--